Friday 21 August 2015

Reclaim civilisational self

Reclaim civilisational self from shallow history texts
 – Anirban Ganguly


In the preface to his three-volume classic, History of the Freedom Movement in India, R. C. Majumdar(1888-1980), one of India’s most distinguished 20th century historians, made a very telling remark, especially relevant to teaching the history of the Indian freedom  movement to young learners. “I have not hesitated,” wrote Majumdar, “to speak out the truth, even if it is in conflict with views cherished and propagated by distinguished political leaders for whom I have the greatest respect.” He also argued that a “solid structure of mutual amity and understanding cannot be built on the quicksands of false history and political expediency.”
One notices a compartmentalised and selective approach to the study of India, especially when examining the freedom struggle and the role of various regions and leaders. How many, for example, have been taught in some detail, of the rebellions against the East India Company rule in the southern region between 1800 and 1801? Why is the Northeast’s contribution to the freedom struggle and its pre-British civilisational identity and achievements not highlighted, researched and taught? Shall we not marvel to know how V. O. Chidambaram Pillai launched a Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company and challenged the British monopoly of the shipping sector until he was held, charged with sedition, and sentenced to life imprisonment? Sri Aurobindo’s columns in Vande Mataram still stir the depths of our being and shape our patriotic sentiments. Ranima Gaidinliu’s exploits continue to inspire, as does the poetry of the revolutionary Subramaniam Bharati. Sister Nivedita’s contribution to strengthening scientific research in India against great colonial opposition is worth knowing.
Political considerations, ideological affiliations—especially of those who have always tried to establish an imported ideology—of well-resourced groups who have thrived in the Western academia by projecting India as a society in perpetual conflict and instability, has largely influenced the study of history. Their prime political objective, despite their arguments to the contrary, has been to generate confusion and to finally deconstruct Bharat’s civilisational self-perception. Therefore, all episodes in our history that have strengthened that civilisational self-perception, any individual or movement that has derived inspiration from Bharat’s civilisational self or has worked to discover and disseminate its achievements has been marginalised and suppressed.
So opportunistic and shallow has been the commitment to officially write the history of the freedom struggle that Marxist historians who got down to writing it could never complete it despite spending crores of taxpayers’ money and working on it for over four decades. The “Towards Freedom” project that continues to languish was essentially handed over to a group of scholars with no known commitment to India’s civilisational ethos and who used the opportunity to perpetuate a political line and to exonerate a political class whose only contribution to the struggle for freedom was through collaboration with colonialists and imperialists in suppressing the movement itself.
But finally, there seems to be a gradual reversal of that approach. Attempts are being made to rediscover and re-interpret, as inspiring icons, many marginalised personalities who have made epochal contributions to shape our civilisational self and world view. Efforts are being made to study and disseminate their contributions, the contributions of historical episodes, events and achievements that have instilled a genuine civilisational sense in us. The compartmentalised approach is being challenged and questioned, new ideas, hitherto suppressed, are finding voice.
Such first steps towards restating our civilisational self is an urgent necessity, it alone can lead towards achieving that second dimension of freedom—the freedom of the mind, self and self-perception. – The New Indian Express, 15 August 2015
» Dr Anirban Ganguly is Director, Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, New Delhi.


Monday 3 August 2015

VIDURA NEETI

VIDURA NEETI

5000 years ago,  Vidura the chief minister and also  brother of King Dhritarashtra counseled on  the characteristics of wise people. Vidura seeks , by urging to king Dhritarashtra to reconsider his thoughts against the Pandavas .
In Udyoga Parva of Maha Bharata   Vidura  outlines so many things that wise wise should do. These tenets are famous in the name of  Vidura neeti. Some such advices are here under for our own benifit:
1. The leader  should wish for the prosperity of all, and should never be biased to one or the other group  for his personal interests and commitment.
2.He should pay attention to those who are in distress depression or adversity. Never should he  ignore the  sufferings of those dependent on him, irrespective of intensity.
3.He should be impartial to the problem placed before him.
4. Agriculture is the basic need and thus seed of economy and the leader should never impede its progress by neglecting it.
5. levying of taxes should be fare and major chunk of it should be allocated to the prosperity of his subjects.
6. He should be fair and accessible to his people. Probity and Prudence are to be the eyes of the King.
7. Welfare of the subjects is his personal responsibility.
8. He should always safeguard the faculty of learning and transmission of knowledge.
9.He should encourage profit and virtue.Noble values are based on compassion, brotherhood, tolerance and respect for all, and these are the  virtuous deeds.
Prosperity or otherwise go hand in hand with the deeds. 
10. He should avoid friendship with the sacrilegious and the sinful who are instrumental in contaminating scrupulous and assiduous guidelines of ruling the kingdom.
11. He should never misuse the treasure .
12. King should never inflict extreme or cruel punishments.
***He should only appoint those as ministers (senior positions in his staff) whom he has examined well for their history of virtue, dispositions, activity and whether they give others their due.
Vidura neethi also includes a few hundred verses with suggestions for personal development and characteristics of a wise person. For example, in Chapter 33, Vidura suggests a wise person refrains from anger, exultation, pride, shame, stupefaction and vanity.
He has reverence and faith, he is unhampered in his endeavors by either adversity or prosperity.
He believes virtue and profit can go together, exerts and acts to the best of his ability, disregards nothing.
He understands quickly, listens carefully, acts with purpose. He does not grieve for what is lost, and does not lose his sense during crisis.
He is constantly learning, he seeks enlightenment from everything he experiences.
He acts after deciding, and decides after thinking.
He neither behaves with arrogance, nor with excessive humility.
He never speaks ill of others, nor praises himself.
He does not exult in honours to himself, nor grieves at insults; he is not agitated by what others do to him just like a calm lake near river Ganges.